The Problematics of Iran's Retaliatory Attack on Israel: Evaluation of the Principles of Necessity and Proportionality Based on Article 51 of the UN Charter.

Authors

  • Mohammad Irvan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM (STIH IBLAM), Indonesia
  • Andri Sutrisno Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM (STIH IBLAM), Indonesia
  • Afrizal Ode Monash University, Melbourne, Australia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0866-1025

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/clr.v3i2.5606

Keywords:

Self Defence Principle, State Sovereignty, Principle of Necessity, Principle of Proportionality.

Abstract

This research analyses the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran's retaliatory strike against Israel on 1 April 2024 in the context of Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, focusing on the application of the principles of necessity and proportionality in international law. The research method used is descriptive-analytical with a normative approach, where international legal norms and the doctrine of self-defence are analysed to assess the validity of Iran's actions. The results of the analysis show that the claim of self-defence by Iran raises doubts, especially in relation to the principle of necessity, given the 11-day time lag between Israel's initial attack and Iran's retaliation, which may not fully meet the immediacy standard. In addition, the scale of Iran's counter-attack, which involved over 300 drones and missiles, appears disproportionate to the threat faced, raising questions regarding compliance with the principle of proportionality. The implications of these findings point to the need for further affirmation of international legal standards regarding self-defence and an enhanced role for the UN Security Council in overseeing such actions to maintain international peace and security.

References

Adhi, Irawan Sapto. “Dampak Terkini Serangan Iran ke Israel , Rusak Pangkalan Militer.†kompas.com, 2024.

Arbar, Thea Fathanah. “Reaksi Dunia Iran Tembak 300 Rudal ke Israel, AS-China, Arab-Rusia.†https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/, 2024.

BBC. “‘Semua mata tertuju ke Israel pascaserangan Iran’, akankah terjadi perang besar-besaran di Timur Tengah?†BBC News Indonesia, n.d. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c19der78ggwo.

El-Shidiq, Riska Alifia. “Kemajuan Nuklir Iran Semakin Pesat di Tengah Konflik Iran dan Israel, Siapakah yang Terkuat?†LINO: Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional 2, no. 1 (2021): 12–17.

Georgiev, V. “International law and support for Ukraine – between ‘responsibility to protect’ obligation and collective self-defense right.†Politics & Security 6, no. 1 (2022): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6618814.

Greenwood, Christopher. “Self-Defence.†Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL], 2011, 148–49.

Guiora, Amos N. “Anticipatory self-defence and international law - A re-evaluation.†Journal of Conflict and Security Law 13, no. 1 (2008): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krn017.

Hamid, Abdul Ghafur. “The legality of anticipatory self-defence in the 21st century world order: A re-appraisal.†Netherlands International Law Review 54, no. 3 (2007): 441–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X0700441X.

Hasan, Finahliyah. “Analisis Kebijakan Pre-Emptive Self Defence George W. Bush, Jr. Terhadap Afghanistan.†Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Departemen Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Universitas Hasanuddin 4, no. 1 (2019): 1–18.

Mandasari, Jayanti retno. “Iran Klaim Serangan ke Israel sebagai Langkah Defensif.†https://www.rri.co.id/, 2024.

Marbun, Arman Surya nicolas, Agus Pramono, dan Kabul Supriyadhie. “ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGGUNAAN PESAWAT TANPA AWAK SEBAGAI ALAT UTAMA PERSENJATAAN DITINJAU DARI HUKUM INTERNASIONAL (STUDI KASUS PENGGUNAAN DRONE OLEH AMERIKA SERIKAT DI PAKISTAN).†Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 4 (2016): 1–12. https://www.academia.edu/34113996/EKSISTENSI_HUKUM_KONTRAK_INNOMINAT_DALAM_RANAH_BISNIS_DI_INDONESIA.

Mubin, Sayyidul, dan Risky Moehamad Adha. “Upaya Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (Pbb) Sebagai Organisasi Internasional Dalam Menengahi Konflik Rusia Dan Ukraina Pada Tahun 2022.†Jurnal Pena Wimaya 2, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31315/jpw.v2i2.7607.

Nadira, Tita, Nuswantoro Dwiwarno, dan Joko Setiyono. “Analisis Yuridis Serangan Amerika Serikat Dengan Pesawat Tanpa Awak Bersenjata Terhadap Komandan Pasukan Quds Korps Garda Revolusi Islam Iran Di Baghdad Irak Menurut Hukum Internasional.†Diponegoro Law Journal 10, no. 2 (2021): 519–44.

Paikah, Nur. “Hukum Internasional untuk Kemanusiaan; Telaah Penyelesaian Persengketaan Dalam Hukum Konvensional Dan Hukum Islam.†Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam 8, no. 1 (2023): 97–108. https://doi.org/10.30863/ajmpi.v8i1.3779.

Prisilia, Tutkey Serin. “Peran Perserikatan Bangsa-bangsa Dalam Penanganan Kasus Kejahatan Genosida Menurut Hukum Internasional.†Lex Administratum IX, no. 6 (2021): 25–34.

Ronzitti, Natalino. “The expanding law of self-defence.†Journal of Conflict and Security Law 11, no. 3 (2006): 343–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krl021.

Shah, Niaz A. “Self-defense in Islamic and International Law.†In Self-defense in Islamic and International Law, 163–72, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230611658_6.

Shodiq, Shubhan. “Women and Terrorism; Analysis of the Repatriation Policy for the Wives and Children of Former Indonesian Citizens from ISIS.†Constitutional Law Review 2, no. 2 (2 Agustus 2024): 129–46. https://doi.org/10.30863/clr.v2i2.5594.

Steenberghe, Raphaël van. “State practice and the evolution of the law of self-defence: clarifying the methodological debate.†Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 2, no. 1 (2015): 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2015.1043096.

Suhayatmi, Alia Rahmatulummah, Sekar Anugrah Resky. “Eskalasi Konflik Iran-Israel di Damaskus: Implikasi terhadap Stabilitas Keamanan Regional dan Global.†Jurnal Hubungan Luar Negeri Kementerian Luar Negeri Indonesia 9, no. 1 (2024).

Teniwut, Meilani. “Iran Klaim Serangan ke Israel Sesuai Pasal 51 Piagam PBB.†mediaindonesia.com, 2024.

Tsagourias, Nicholas. “Self-defence against non-state actors: The interaction between self-defence as a primary rule and self-defence as a secondary rule.†Leiden Journal of International Law 29, no. 3 (2016): 801–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156516000327.

Upeniece, V. “Conditions for the lawful exercise of the right of self-defence in international law.†SHS Web of Conferences 40 (2018): 01008. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184001008.

Welle, Deutsche. “Iran Usai Gempur Israel : Jika Dibalas , Serangan Kami Akan Lebih Besar !†detikNews.com, 2024.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-02

How to Cite

Irvan, M., Sutrisno, A., & Ode, A. (2024). The Problematics of Iran’s Retaliatory Attack on Israel: Evaluation of the Principles of Necessity and Proportionality Based on Article 51 of the UN Charter. Constitutional Law Review, 3(2), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.30863/clr.v3i2.5606

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with Contitutional Law Review (Colrev) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 

  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.