Restructuring Electoral Cycles: Remedial Calibration and Legislative Discretion in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024

Authors

  • Satriadi Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone, Indonesia
  • Lisma Lisma Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone, Indonesia
  • Lukman Ansar Institut Agama Islam Negeri Fattahul Muluk Papua, Indonesia
  • Tarmizi Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia
  • Sabar Podu Institut Agama Islam Negeri Fattahul Muluk Papua, Indonesia
  • Wira Kafryawan School of Culture, History and Language, Australian National University, Australia
  • David Aprizon Putra Prodi Hukum Tata Negara, Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam, IAIN Curup, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/clr.v5i1.6029

Keywords:

Remedial calibration, electoral cycles, legislative discretion, open legal policy, Indonesian Constitutional Court

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024 restructures Indonesia’s electoral system by separating national and subnational elections and prescribing an interval of between two and two and a half years. This article evaluates the constitutional legitimacy of that intervention through doctrinal constitutional research and functional comparison. It develops a two-level framework distinguishing structural justification from remedial calibration. The analysis finds that the Court had a defensible constitutional basis for separating the two electoral cycles, given concerns relating to popular sovereignty, electoral quality, institutional capacity, political recruitment, and legislative inertia. However, the judgment provides a weaker constitutional and evidential basis for prescribing the precise temporal interval. It does not sufficiently explain why the selected minimum and maximum periods were necessary or why less intrusive remedies preserving greater legislative discretion would have been inadequate. The article argues that open legal policy neither immunises electoral legislation from review nor permits complete judicial displacement of legislative choice. Legitimate constitutional remedies must remain proportionate, evidence-based, and attentive to institutional competence.

References

Aboelazm, K S, R Raafat, H Sharif, dan E Ibrahim. “THE IMPACT OF JUDICIAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT REVIEW OF LEGISLATIVE OMISSION ON CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITARIANISM.” Corporate Law and Governance Review 7, no. 4 (2025): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv7i4p2.

Afesha, N, dan H R Barrett. “Constitutional Remedies for Enforcement of Fundamental Rights in Ethiopia and India: A Comparative Study.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 43, no. 3 (2025): 264–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2025.2557116.

Ardhanariswari, R, E Nursetiawan, S D Amalia, E D Cahyani, dan R M Fadzil. “Upholding Judicial Independence through the Practice of Judicial Activism in Constitutional Review: A Study by Constitutional Judges.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi 6, no. 2 (2023): 183–207. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i2.9565.

Arifin, F, I Maarif, I G P Astawa, M K Abdullah, dan R A Bahri. “Open Legal Policy Criteria in the Constitutional Court Decision: An Evaluation and Recommendation.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 12, no. 2 (2025): 216–33. https://doi.org/10.22304/2442-9325.1335.

Bavarian, The. “Judgment of the Second Senate of 30 July 2024—Federal Elections Act 2023. Perkara 2 BvF 1/23, 2 BvF 3/23, 2 BvE 2/23, 2 BvE 9/23, 2 BvE 10/23, 2 BvR 1523/23, dan 2 BvR 1547/23.,” no. 64 (2024): 1–9.

Bisariyadi. “Referencing International Human Rights Law in Indonesian Constitutional Adjudication.” Constitutional Review 4, no. 2 (2018): 249–70. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev424.

Butt, S, dan F Siregar. “Multilayered Oversight: Electoral Administration in Indonesia.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 16, no. S1 (2021): S121–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2021.32.

Butt, Simon, dan Prayekti Murharjanti. “What constitutes compliance? Legislative responses to Constitutional Court decisions in Indonesia.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 20, no. 1 (1 Januari 2022): 428–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014.

Dixon, Rosalind, dan Po Jen Yap. “Responsive judicial remedies.” Global Constitutionalism 14, no. 2 (2025): 323–48. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S2045381724000200.

Fionna, U, dan F E Hutchinson. “INDONESIA’S 2019 ELECTIONS: A FRACTURED DEMOCRACY?” Asian Affairs 50, no. 4 (2019): 502–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2019.1672400.

Fuadi, A B. “Legal Policy for Simultaneous Election Regulations.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 3 (2021): 702–23. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk18310.

Gardbaum, S. “Comparative political process theory II.” Global Constitutionalism 14, no. 2 (2025): 219–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381724000029.

Hanan, D, T Sulistianing Astuti, dan L W Eddyono. “Electoral Reform Through the Indonesian Constitutional Court: Constitutionality of Presidential Candidacy Threshold in Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 22, no. 2 (2025): 260–92. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2223.

Huq, Aziz. “The Entrenchment of Democracy: The Comparative Constitutional Law of Elections, Parties, and Voting.” Cambridge University Press, 2024.

Karjoko, L, L.T.A.L. Wardhani, S Marwiyah, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, A K Jaelani, A Tahir, dan S Al-Fatih. “Problems of democratic and dignified election in indonesian simultaneously electoral era.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9 (2020): 1701–8. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.193.

Kartabrata, F R. “PENGUATAN PARTAI POLITIK DALAM PEMILIHAN UMUM LEGISLATIF PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 114/PUU-XX/2022.” Jurnal Litigasi 24, no. 2 (2023): 229–60. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v24i2.9860.

Laksono, F, dan O V Agustine. “Election Design Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/puu-xi/2013.” Constitutional Review 2, no. 2 (2016): 216–33. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev223.

Leckey, Robert. “The Harms of Remedial Discretion.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 14, no. 3 (2016): 584–607. https://doi.org/https://doi-org.proxy.undip.ac.id/10.1093/icon/mow042.

Negara, T A S, D Cahyandari, A Siboy, dan A K Jaelani. “The Confrontational Role of the Constitutional Court’s Decisions in the Legislative Process.” International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences 17, no. 1 (2022): 185–98. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756099.

Norman, F, S Hadiwijaya, dan F E Gunawan. “Preliminary Study: Electronic Counting in Indonesian National Election Using Computer Answer Sheets and DMR Software.” In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3557738.3557858.

Perbawa, K.S.L.P. “Open Justice Policy in Constitutional Court Decision and Law in Indonesia.” International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences 18, no. 2 (2023): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756307.

Rahman, F. “Anomaly of Conditional Clause Implementation in Constitutional Review Decision.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 1 (2020): 27–53. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1712.

———. “Application of Conditionally Clauses in a Formal Constitutional Review Decision.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 2 (2022): 381–405. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1926.

Rahmayanty, Mubarika, dan Irfan Amir. “Juridical Analysis of Implementing the Presidential Threshold in the Presidential Election Of Indonesia.” Jurnal Al-Dustur 4, no. 1 (2021): 83–107. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.30863/jad.v4i1.1477.

Republik Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi. “Putusan Makkamah Konstitusi No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024.” Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2024.

Samad, A W, Z M Utama, dan E Hermawan. An Analysis of the Impact of the 2024 Election on Democracy in Indonesia from a Human Resource Management Perspective, 1180 LNNS Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 161–83 (2025).

Sani, Arsul. “Reconfiguring Electoral Design Post-Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024: Prospects for Meaningful Voter Participation.” Jurnal Konstitusi 22, no. 4 (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk22410.

Shalihah, A, dan E Huroiroh. “The Optimization of Bawaslu’s Role in the 2024 Simultaneous Elections.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 3 (2024): 501–17. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2139.

Siefken, S T. “The Electoral Law of Germany after the Constitutional Court Decision of 2024 Continuity and Change in Personalized Proportional Representation.” German Politics and Society 42, no. 3 (2024): 75–86. https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2024.420304.

Sinani, B. “Global Patterns of Constitutional Judicial Review Systems: Two Major Models of Constitutional Judicial Review in the World.” Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law 14, no. 1 (2024): 155–72. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85186591810&partnerID=40&md5=7b089d36e360ac00bf15450650c2eaab.

Sulistyowati, T, dan A Satrio. “Strengthening the legitimacy of the indonesian constitutional court decision through supermajority requirement: Lesson from the south korean experience.” Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais 10, no. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v10i3.89341.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Rucho v. Common Cause, 588 U.S. 684 (2019).

Susanto, M E I. “FAT COALITION AND CROWN-PRESIDENTIALISM?: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF INDONESIA ’ S CONCURRENT ELECTIONS.” PETITA 10, no. 1 (2025): 35–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v10i1.757.

Tarnowska, A. “Constitutional courts and representative democracy- a kelsenian perspective.” Comparative Law Review 25 (2019): 277–98. https://doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2019.010.

Verte?-Olteanu, A, dan D.-A. Caramidariu. “Safeguarding democracy Constitutional insights from Romania’s election annulment.” Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo 27, no. 1 (2025): 139–65. https://doi.org/10.17394/116461.

Wibowo, M, I N Nurjaya, M A Safaat, dan J Hamidi. “The Criticism on the Meaning of ‘Open Legal Policy’ in Verdicts of Judicial Review at the Constitutional Court.” Constitutional Review 3, no. 2 (2017): 262–86. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev326.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-13

How to Cite

Satriadi, Lisma, L., Ansar, L., Tarmizi, Podu, S., Kafryawan , W., & Putra, D. A. (2026). Restructuring Electoral Cycles: Remedial Calibration and Legislative Discretion in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024. Constitutional Law Review, 5(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.30863/clr.v5i1.6029

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Satriadi Satriadi, Lisma Lisma, Lukman Ansar, Tarmizi Tarmizi, Sabar Podu, Wira Kafryawan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Contitutional Law Review (Colrev) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 

  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.